We’ve done the calculations and worked out how much portable ACs will cost to run from 1st July
British summers have evolved from being consistently drizzly and mild to now featuring heatwaves that beckon the need for cooling solutions. Portable air conditioners have emerged as a viable option for those seeking relief from the sweltering heat. However, before making the investment, it’s crucial to understand how much it costs to run a portable air conditioner. These cooling devices are indeed beneficial, especially when conventional fans fall short in combating extreme heat. To make an informed decision, one must decipher the financial implications of operating a portable air conditioner in the long run.
The Functionality of Portable Air Conditioners
Portable air conditioners are engineered to draw in room air and pass it across a cold surface, thereby cooling and dehumidifying the air. The heat extracted from the air is expelled outside the room through a duct, often placed in a window, while the cooled and dry air is recirculated indoors. This cooling mechanism helps create a comfortable indoor environment even during scorching temperatures, making portable air conditioners a valuable investment.
Determining the Cost of Running a Portable Air Conditioner
Understanding the cost of operating a portable air conditioner is vital for individuals weighing the pros and cons of this cooling solution against traditional fans. To determine the cost accurately, it’s essential to consider the electricity consumption of these devices.
Electricity Usage of Portable Air Conditioners
The electricity consumption of portable air conditioners varies, typically ranging from 1000 to 1300 watts (W), equivalent to 1 to 1.3 kilowatt-hours (kWh). The measurement of these devices is often expressed in British Thermal Units (BTU), which quantifies their cooling capacity. To put it in perspective, 1 kilowatt (kW) equates to 3412 BTU. For example, a portable air conditioner with a cooling power of 3kW would be labeled as a 10,000 BTU model (approximately 10,236 BTU).
For instance, consider the Russell Hobbs Portable Air Conditioner, priced at £499.99 on Amazon. It boasts a cooling capacity of 11,000 BTU and operates at a wattage of 12,000W.
Calculating the Operational Cost
Calculating the cost of running a portable air conditioner is straightforward. It parallels the process of determining the expense of operating other electrical appliances like tumble dryers. As of 1st July 2023, following a reduction in the energy price cap, electricity in the UK is priced at 30.1p per kWh. This rate represents the maximum allowable charge for electricity from providers, as most providers tend to charge at this maximum rate.
With this pricing information in mind, calculating the operational cost of a portable air conditioner becomes clear. For instance, a portable air conditioner consuming 1000W (1kW) of electricity, such as the Duux North 9K Smart Air Conditioner priced at £850 at Argos, utilizes 1 kWh of electricity per hour. Therefore, operating this air conditioner for one hour would cost 30p, while two hours of usage would incur a cost of 60p, and so on.
It’s worth noting that the wattage (or BTU) of a portable air conditioner directly influences its operating cost. For instance, the Black+Decker BXAC40008GB Portable 3-in-1 Air Conditioner, a bestseller on Amazon, has a cooling power of 12,000 BTU or 3.5 kWh. Running this air conditioner for one hour would cost approximately £1.05.
Comparing Fans and Portable Air Conditioners
In the realm of home cooling solutions, it’s crucial to consider the economics of running different appliances, particularly when energy efficiency and cost savings are priorities. Generally speaking, fans emerge as the more cost-effective option in comparison to portable air conditioners, making them the preferred choice for those who are conscious of their energy expenditure and eager to make eco-friendly choices.
To put this into perspective, let’s delve into the numbers. An energy-efficient fan with an “A” rating can operate for less than a single penny per hour, offering a wallet-friendly cooling solution that won’t burden your electricity bill. In contrast, a typical 7,000 BTU portable air conditioner can cost approximately £0.28 per hour to run, a significant difference in operational expenses, as highlighted by Chris from Meaco.
However, it’s vital to acknowledge that fans and portable air conditioners fulfill distinct roles within the realm of climate control. Fans are primarily designed to circulate air within a room, fostering a cooling sensation by improving airflow. They effectively combat the feeling of stuffiness and are especially useful during mildly warm periods.
On the other hand, portable air conditioners are engineered to do more than just move air around—they actively extract hot air from the indoor environment and release it outside. This process enhances overall air circulation, preventing the accumulation of stagnant, warm air indoors. This advanced cooling capability comes at a higher initial cost, both in terms of purchasing the appliance itself and the operational expenses it incurs.
One strategy to manage the costs associated with portable air conditioners is to use them judiciously. Instead of attempting to rapidly bring down the indoor temperature in response to scorching weather, consider running the unit for shorter durations. Portable air conditioners can efficiently cool down rooms, making it possible to maintain a comfortable environment without continuous operation.
In conclusion, understanding the nuances of running a portable air conditioner in the UK is essential for individuals seeking respite from sweltering weather conditions. While it’s evident that these cooling devices may impose a higher operational cost when compared to fans, their unparalleled ability to create genuinely comfortable indoor environments during heatwaves justifies the investment. By being cognizant of their energy consumption and adopting efficient usage practices, users can enjoy the benefits of portable air conditioners without incurring exorbitant energy bills, all while contributing to a cooler, greener future.